As a reminder, by 3/5 please make sure you have contacted all members of your Wikipedia working team to do the following:
- designate a team leader to coordinate the group;
- decide on when/where you will schedule working time for the remainder of the project;
- decide on several possible article topics ("pitches"), along with what your group could potentially offer the topic, if we select it for our class project.
Project Wikipedia Working Teams:
- Anneleise Sanchez, Austin Tillery, Morgan Hough
- Lindsey Sullivan, Rachel Cushanick, Shay Morant
- Brittany Stephens, Erik Reed, Jordan Spina, Nick Pelton
- Amanda Diehl, Cassie Hamilton
, Joseph Hendel - Chris Menendez, Danae VanPortfliet, Jenn Gaudreau
- Brittany Morrill, Donovan Todd, Tyler Avery
- Catalina Quintana, Katherine Saviola, Joey Arellano
- Alex Snider, Rachel Young, Stacey Cox
There is no new reading for Tuesday's class, but we will spend the first 25-30 minutes following up Thursday's Wikipedia discussion with Dr. Wadewitz, with the goal of selecting our article topic for the Wikipedia project. I offer you the following links in advance of our discussion:
- a student-produced Wiki Book (not Wikipedia) on <"rhetoric and writing in the public sphere">
- a crowd-sourced book (produced by scholars in one week) on <"hacking the academy">
- a Wikipedia page on <"article development">
- another Wikipedia page on <"featured article candidates">.
For the remainder of the class, we will review Ridolfo/DeVoss on "rhetorical velocity" and Killingsworth on appealing to "place" and "time." Our goal is to better understand embodied arguments--especially to understand how much the success of any public-sphere argument rests on its many embodiments (e.g., place, time, audience, environment). We will also consider how some different visual genres have fulfilled the Public Argument and/or what it is like to argue through alternative mediums.
Looking forward to it,
-Prof. Graban